9 1免费版下

Skip to main content

Faculty reviews of academic programs

Evidence鈥恇ased reviews of academic programs are a crucial component of 9 1免费版下鈥檚 quality assurance activities.

Quality assurance activities at 9 1免费版下

Evidence鈥恇ased reviews of academic programs are a crucial component of 9 1免费版下鈥檚 quality assurance activities. Cyclical program reviews support strategic, academic program planning and continuous improvement, and enhance the effectiveness and student focus of our program offerings.鈥疊y undertaking such reviews, faculties demonstrate responsibility and transparency and critically assess progress toward their own goals.鈥

Reviews of undergraduate academic programs within a faculty are the responsibility of the dean. Reviews of graduate-level programs are a joint responsibility of the dean and the Faculty of Graduate Studies.

View the Senate Policy for Faculty Reviews of Academic Programs for more information

Resources for faculties

For programs undergoing review this year, please ensure you鈥檙e enrolled in the Program Review Community Teams site (contact the Academic Quality Assurance Manager) for information on upcoming sessions, new resources, etc.

Policy, procedures, and requirements

Scheduling and reporting reviews

9 1免费版下 is required to provide annual reports to external stakeholders on program review activity. To support this work, schedules of鈥痯lanned reviews and鈥痗onfirmation of鈥痳eviews undertaken鈥痵hould be provided to the Office of the Provost and Vice-President Academic. Once a review is complete (report and action plan submitted), the Dean's Office should contact the academic quality assurance manager to provide confirmation/dates.鈥

  • Reviews are to occur every 5-7 years; newly established or significantly modified programs are to be reviewed within 2 years after the first cohort has graduated.
  • Two or more academic programs may be reviewed together or as part of a unit review. For example, all interrelated programs within a unit, including majors, honours, minors, and certificates, may be reviewed simultaneously.
  • All schedules are at the discretion of the dean, and in the case of graduate programs, communicated to and mutually agreed upon with the Faculty of Graduate Studies.
  • Maintaining a comprehensive, faculty-level schedule of reviews will ensure the appropriate distribution of reviews and aid strategic planning around resources (human and financial). It will also help 9 1免费版下 Analytics to plan for their own resources and ensure appropriate data support.

听

听

In advance of your next accreditation site visit (or within 6-weeks thereafter), please follow the procedures in Appendix C of the Senate Policy for Faculty Reviews of Academic Programs. This is in addition to the reporting requirements referenced on the Accredited Programs page.

Curriculum and analytics

  • Departments or programs in the early stages of a program review or accreditation process can schedule a consultation with the senior educational developer, curriculum鈥痠n the鈥Centre for Learning and Teaching (CLT) to take advantage of CLT鈥檚 resources to design learning outcomes and map the curriculum.
  • 听 [XLSX] (login required)
  • 9 1免费版下 Analytics听works with academic units to generate program-level data dashboards and may also, upon request and consultation, provide customized data for programs under review.

External Reviewers and Site-Visit

  • [PDF-353KB]
  • 听[PDF-543KB] (login required)

Templates

Templates are housed on our myDal site, accessible to current faculty and staff.
Login may be required; templates may be edited as required.

Review committee planning

  • 鈥痆顿翱颁-39碍叠闭鈥

Communications and outreach

  • 鈥痆顿翱颁-26碍叠闭
  • 鈥痆顿翱颁-78碍叠闭鈥
  • 鈥痆顿翱颁-51碍叠闭鈥
  • 鈥痆DOC -50KB]

More to explore

Accreditation Faculty reviews